Posted by: MYPLACE FP7 | September 4, 2012

When is a kettle not a kettle? When it is on slow boil…

 MYPLACE coordinator Professor Hilary Pilkington (University of Manchester) sends this report from the field, on some of her experiences in her work on an ethnographic case study for MYPLACE.

For more information on the MYPLACE project, visit the project’s website: HERE

For the past few months, Hilary Pilkington (University of Manchester) has been attending demonstrations and other events organised by the English Defence League  (EDL) ( http://englishdefenceleague.org/) as part of MYPLACE project ethnographic research. Travelling with members of the organisation (who are aware of their status as researchers) to these events has allowed them to experience demonstrations from the perspective of EDL members themselves. This blog is not about the EDL and its goals, therefore, but a report on the policing of a particular  demonstration that might be experienced by members of a wide range of organisations.

When is a kettle[1] not a kettle? When it is on slow boil…

On 1 September the EDL conducted a legally sanctioned demonstration in Walthamstow, East London (for details of the aims of the demonstration set out by the EDL, see: http://englishdefenceleague.org/home/edl-news/529-walthamstow-demonstration-september-1st-2012). It was roundly declared by demonstrators to be ‘the worst demo ever’. It is not hard to understand why: demonstrators never reached the final rendezvous point where speeches by EDL leaders were meant to take place; they were on the receiving end of a barrage of eggs thrown by counter-demonstrators; they were kept within a tight police containment cordon from approximately 12.30 to 10pm; and, before finally being released, they were arrested en masse under Section 60 of the Criminal Justice Act (breach of peace), regardless of whether there was any evidence that individuals had participated in, or were likely to participate in, any public order offence.

Demonstrators being escorted onto the tube at Kings Cross

The purpose of this blog is not to debate the rights or wrongs of EDL views or policies but to describe the experience of being on that demonstration from a participant’s perspective and raise questions about whether police strategy was, in this instance, warranted.

The first indication that this was going to be a demonstration with a difference was when the usual police escort into the initial ‘muster’ place as EDL coaches approach the city of demonstration did not materialise. Instead two coaches of EDL demonstrators offloaded their contents at King’s Cross station with no police presence and no knowledge of whether counter demonstrators were waiting. Fortunately (but it appeared to be luck rather than planning on the part of the police) demonstrators were picked up from the station front by EDL stewards and guided towards the designated pub (where the police were in attendance) without violent incident. Around 12.30 the police began to move the demonstrators towards the start point of the march – this involved taking them back to Kings Cross and escorting them on a packed and claustrophobic tube train half a dozen stops down the line to Blackhorse Road, maximizing disruption to public transport and other passengers.

Demonstrators were contained outside Blackhorse Rd tube station for a while after which they began ‘the long march’ to Waltham Forest Magistrates court. Because of the endless stops while the police tried to clear counter demonstrators from the sanctioned route and, when this proved impossible, the EDL march was re-routed, this relatively short journey took around two hours. This process (already now lasting around three hours) is reminiscent of what has been referred to as a ‘mobile kettle’ (http://www.soundthealarm.org.uk/nov-9-mobile-kettle-demo/). But the frustration was only about to begin. The demonstrators (media reports have varied in their estimates of EDL demonstrators from 200-500 but based on previous demonstrations, we would estimate there were 500-600) were then fully kettled for a further two hours, in full view of the final destination (where the rally was meant to take place) and of the counter demonstration, which had effectively prevented the EDL rally taking place. Police vans and a solid police cordon prevented any movement outside a contained area while police with dogs patrolled the grassy area that lay between EDL demonstrators and their final destination. As is clear from the photo below, throughout this period of containment demonstrators were videoed by the police.

It was at this point that the mood began to become agitated. Despite the total lack of information, as time ticked on it was clear that the speeches that the demonstrators had come to hear would not take place. Periodically small groups of demonstrators hatched plans to ‘break out’ of the kettle area  and, when they attempted this, scuffles broke out with the police. As rumours spread that the  EDL leadership had abandoned the attempt to hold the rally and been escorted away, the mood grew despondent. It was now around 5 hours since anybody had had access to water, food or toilets and frustration rose. The ‘long march’ back began…

Demonstrators are ‘contained’ close to Waltham Forest Magistrates Court

 

If anything counter demonstrators were more effective on the return march – splitting into small groups and now armed with eggs and other missiles, they moved from side street to side street causing the police to slow the ‘mobile kettle’ to a halt while, with riot helmets donned, they cleared the next street. Around an hour or so later, demonstrators were back at Blackhorse Road station where, it had been promised, the coaches they had come to London would be waiting to take them out of the city.

That was the last, and erroneous, piece of information that demonstrators received until around 8.30pm. Then, suddenly, after two hours of questions about ‘what is happening’ had been met with a uniform ‘we don’t know’ from police officers on the ground, somebody, somewhere managed to persuade a police officer to tell us that the Commander in charge had ordered that all demonstrators would arrested under Section 60 of the Criminal Justice Act (breach of peace). As protests went up about the justification of this, demonstrators were told that this was ‘in your interest’ as it allowed the police to remove people from the area and thus ‘prevent’ further breach of peace. At this point a number of us did point out to the police officers on the ground that the coaches that had brought us to London were parked 50 metres away and, if just some of the officers containing us in the area were released to escort demonstrators to their right coaches, they could achieve the same aim without causing themselves a significant amount of paperwork and demonstrators another two hours of discomfort. The response, understandably, was that this was ‘not our decision’. So, there then began a very, very long process of the search and arrest of each individual protestor (taken out in twos). In the course of this process, a few dozen bottles of water were thrown into the crowd and shared by those who caught them. It would be another couple of hours (making it 10 or more in total) before anybody would see food or a toilet.

The remains of the march: a scene from the final kettle

 

After we had all been read our rights, told what we had been arrested for, searched and given a copy of our arrest docket, we were transported with our arresting officers to the other end of London (the coaches by this time had been told to leave) and left to find some way back to wherever we had come from. Before we left the bus, we were told that we were ‘no longer under arrest’; a police officer’s word, I guess, has to be trusted….

This is not a blog about the EDL. It does not seek to portray them as victims (nor as criminals). But anybody knows that if you put a kettle on slow boil for ten hours, it will run dry, and when it does, it will explode. Given the experience of demonstrators, who came to a legally sanctioned demonstration and behaved peaceably[2], were subjected to containment in a ‘mobile kettle’ for ten hours without access to water, food or toilets, it is, in fact, remarkable that no serious violence took place at Walthamstow. At the bitter end, many demonstrators declared that they would ‘never again’ attend a demonstration. Before you conclude that this is a ‘victory’ for police strategy, consider whether you would have the same reaction if the demonstration had not been organised by the EDL?


[1] The term ‘kettle’ or ‘kettling’ refers to a police strategy of surrounding demonstrators at a protest in order to contain them in a particular place. The police argue it is necessary as a preventative measure to avoid violence or disorder during demonstrations, but it is increasingly being used for long periods of time and protest groups have argued that it is deployed to deliberately frustrate demonstrators or as a means of ascertaining personal details and photographs of protestors.

[2] There were 20 arrests for offences other than the ‘breach of peace’ arrest imposed on all participants, of which only 9 were EDL demonstrators (others were involved in the counter demonstration) and primarily for possession of drugs, fireworks etc.


Responses

  1. Reblogged this on Charlie and the Stoney Jackets Factory and commented:
    Shocking report

  2. Hilary Pilkington seems not to have noticed that, far from behaving “peaceably”, when the EDL marched through Walthamstow, they loudly accused passers-by of being (in their opinion) paedophiles etc, then, as soon as the EDL heard chants from counter-protestors, the EDL threw thunder-flashes at the counter-protestors. In case you’re not familiar with the terminology, thunder-flashes aren’t just common-on-garden firecrackers, they’re Army hand-grenade simulators, which, since they’re as powerful as military grade hand-grenades, but packed in cardboard rather than in metal fragmentation-casing, don’t produce shrapnel and are unlikely to kill anyone. They are however still military grade munitions and can cause serious injuries, and it is the EDL’s use of those weapons which provoked the mass arrest of EDL members at the end of the demo.

    Other details Hilary Pilkington failed to notice were the EDL demonstrators displaying Nazi tattoos, wearing Nazi T-shirts and giving Nazi salutes in Walthamstow. How a Professor of Sociology failed to notice all this is a mystery, however descriptions of all this, clear photos of the Nazi t-shirts, tattoos and salutes etc, and videos of the explosions appeared on-line almost immediately afterwards – all that was required to find them was to use Google

  3. Thanks to Dean for his comments, especially for mentioning the thunder flashes – one of the demonstrators I was stood close to was injured by one.

    As I indicated in the blog, this piece was not intended to be about the EDL as such but about the policing of a demonstration. The research has only just begun and it would be inappropriate to make statements about the findings at this stage. And, as Dean says, there are plenty of photos on the web from which readers can draw their own conclusions. What I was trying to do in this blog was to provide a partial (not as in ‘biased’ or ‘prejudiced’ but literally ‘partial’, since I had a particular place in amongst the crowd and can comment only on what I saw from that position, as indeed can anybody else there) view of the experience of the policing on that day.

    Regarding the reason for arrest – there have been many different versions from different people. The one Dean gives is new to me. It was certainly not mentioned at all by any of the police officers I talked to on the day, nor in the response to my letter to the Metropolitan Police. The police maintained that the arrests were preventative – in order to stop potential breach of the peace. This potential was decided solely on the basis of ‘association’ i.e. the presence of people within the EDL march. When I showed evidence that I was participating in the demonstration as a researcher rather than a movement member, it made no difference at all. It is interesting to contrast this with the policy adopted by police managing the EDL demonstration in Walsall on 29 September. Again speaking solely from my particular vantage point within the demonstration, there was significantly more violence and injuries during that demonstration but no mass arrests were made. Demonstrators were released in small groups and those the police had reason to believe had been involved in violence, on the basis of their video footage, were detained.

    Obviously the police make tactical decisions in each case and I am not qualified to evaluate those decisions in terms of thier effectiveness in maintaining public order. As a sociologist, though, I do know that the response of the police (and other authorities) is extremely important in shaping the views and actions of people engaged in protest movements. Where police responses are experienced as excessive or where demonstrators perceive themselves to have been treated differently from other demonstrators, it fuels a pre-existing sense of injustice which can only exacerbate tension. This is certainly one consequence of the policing strategy implemented at the Walthamstow march.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: